Addiction of dependence


The trade versus aid Song  by Samriddhi The Prosperity Foundation provoked me again about the parasitic nature in Nepal. People have developed the psychology that  the government should provide goods and services for their life and blame the government for not being able to provide their life as they expected. According to APA Dictionary of Psychology, psychological dependence is the “dependence on a psychoactive substance for the reinforcement it provides.” This psychological dependence has become an addiction in context to Nepal and made us parasites.

At an average, I merely find people who think they are responsible for their good and bad on their own. To stop to expect from the government to prosper ourselves is one of the main war that Nepali people have to fight with themselves. And to stop to be dependent on the foreign aid is one of the war Nepal has to fight. By nature, voluntary exchange of goods, services and love amongst, have been the basics of life. Identifying the strength and resources within and converting them to the goods and services that can be exchanged voluntarily / traded with others is the only way an individual can prosper his life. And the same is valid to the nation.

 Nepal and Nepali have to break the addiction of dependence be responsible to ourselves, if we really want to prosper our life.

At Shanghai Austrian Economic Summit


Group Photo With Participants of SAES

SFL SA with Palmer and Casey

Students For Liberty South Asia Team with Tom G. Palmer, Casey Lartigue, Yeonmi Park and Wolf von Laer

with Tom and Riya

With Tom G. Palmer and Riya Basnet

Socials at SAES

Social at SAES

With Ken

Social at SAES with Ken Schooland

at socials

Social at SAES with Casey Lartigue


With Casey

Renee, Ani, Yeonmi, anuj (me), Casey, Riya

Analysing Petroleum Price Hike and the strike


The Nepal Oil Corporation (NOC) has jacked up fuel prices effective from Saturday afternoon. Diesel and kerosene prices have been hiked by Rs 1 per litre, while petrol has become dearer by Rs 2 per litre. As per the new rates, diesel/kerosene will cost Rs 100 per litre, while petrol will available for Rs 125 per litre. The price of aviation fuel sold to domestic airlines has been hiked by Rs 10 per litre to Rs 130 per litre, and that sold to international carriers has been increased by $50 per kilo litre to $1,300 per kilo litre.

With this revision, NOC’s monthly projected loss will come down to Rs 1 billion from Rs 1.15 billion. NOC dropped its plan to raise the price of LPG fearing possible political backlash, sources said. NOC faces Rs 733 million in monthly losses from its LPG business alone. On a LPG cylinder, NOC incurs Rs 523 loss.

Nepalese students protesting at fuel price rises set a parked bus on fire and vandalized other vehicles on Wednesday during a strike in the capital Kathmandu, leading police to make more than 60 arrests.
The city-wide strike, called by student unions to protest at an increase in the price of petrol, diesel, kerosene and aviation fuel last week, saw schools and colleges shut and most government vehicles stay off the roads. Some 2,000 police patrolled the streets, detaining protesters as they tried to enforce the strike by stopping vehicles.

A question just stroke to me. NOC’s monthly projected loss will come down to Rs 1 billion from Rs 1.15 billion. How is this covered? or How has this been covered? Of course, the loss is ultimately coming upon the head of government, as it owns NOC. How will the government cover the loss? The absolute answer is from the tax paid by country people and or loan, either of the way, it is covered by the sum of money that otherwise should have been sanctioned for the development projects. Thence, the loss is going to be covered from the payment of the fund collected from and for all Nepali people.

I do not know which group and with what motives, are the students calling for the strike. But its obvious, it tends to add the burden to all Nepali, by reducing a part of the burden of the consumers of the product. If the NOC gets loss, the loss is to be covered by the fund collected and should have been targeted all people. The consumers of the product may be in balance, but it is to rob the non-consumers. To summarise, the strike is called up to rob the non-consumers. Wouldn’t it be better that the cost of the product be beared by the consumer of the product. In my view, NOC should not make up the price to go for loss. The single penny of loss of the NOC is the direct loss of non-consumers and low-consumers of the product.

Inequality and Growth


A society constitutes of variety of people with variety of skills, knowledge and attitude. This is what brings variation in the achievements and living of individuals, some achieve more some achieve less, some grow rich some remain poor. Its the natural phenomena. To try to make the rich ones achieve less and the poor ones achieve more is in fact to try to disturb the natural growth cycle. Making one achieve more than what s/he deserve may be kindness but doing so by compelling the captives one to give away the benefits obtained by their toil is not a fare practice. A voluntary service can be considered to be ethical to help the less deserver, rather then making the real deserver to contribute with coercion.

We have different philosophies and organizations (political and non-political) trying hard to reduce the natural human in-equality towards equality. I really question myself “Is this natural brone in-equality really evil and needs to be reduced?” And “Should we worry more about the in-equality than growth?”

Is the economic inequality really a problem? Are the less fortunate suffering because someone are succeeding? If so how many people are suffering because of the Billionaire of Nepal, Mr. Binod Chaudhary? Wait a sec, had there not been Chaudhary group, how many people would suffer? Lets just consider, Chaudhary Group closes from a day x. Then, how many people in Nepal are going to be jobless? How much people had to depend on imported goods? How much costly the product would have been? Chaudhary Group was a start from a zero and regular addition of the building block in seek of betterment. It did not earn by slaving people. It earned by giving job and providing living of numerous families. He grew more, other grew less. And he deserved to be so. To forget the growth of living standard of numerous families and to accuse the inequality is just to be jealous of the success of people. I just say “Why to worry about someone making his fortune, by using his physical and/or mental abilities?” But what if he had not initiated the company? Would anyone work if he will not achieve more then other? And would anyone work more and more if he would not achieve more and more? Getting more is the inspiration that promotes one to work harder. As a summary, its the inequality that motivates people for the growth. Nobody will work harder to just be equal or almost equal with others. In my view, Nepal needs to forget the chapter of economic equality, at least for decades, if it really wants to grow.

Is Nepal poor? Then why is so?


We can divide people in around 2:1 ratio for the answer of the question “Is Nepal poor?”, majority saying “Yes” and remaining saying “No, but Yes”. However, if we take a LCM, Yes is the lowest common factor for the Question. Nepal is among the world’s poorest countries. One third of people live below poverty line. More than a quarter population are insufficiently fed and some 7 percent of people are worried about meeting two inns every day.

Why is Nepal Poor?

Discussing on the topic we can come through various points from the educational, social, geographical, political and various factors that has led Nepal to be poor, some of which I would like to discuss.

1. More than 60% Nepali do not have higher education

2. Nepal is a land-locked country (No sea border), and between two densely populated and powerful countries

3.Complicated Geography with more than 60% area falls in Mountainous region

4. Majority of Nepali cannot read, write and/or speak English

5. Corruption

6. Immoral Politicians

7. Manpower and Brain Drain

More or less we come to feel each of the reasons are the factor that has caused our country to be poor. But in my understanding all of these are just the part of our Culture of Blames. For me “Every excuse are Lies”, and all these reasons are just the excuses each of us make to blame the nature and group of people to separate ourselves apart of it.

1. The fact may be true that more than 60% percent of people do not have higher education. But I find no clue, how this affects the country to be poor in a real sense. If higher education was the factor responsible for people being poor, then around 60% people should have been below poverty line, which does not applies. Neither does it apply that none of the educated ones are living below poverty line. I can say it, because I have seen the scenario of many graduates living the life below poverty line. We have a mixed population of with and without higher education living in various level of life standard. In fact, except come exceptions, most of the people with higher education in Nepal are living poorer lifestyle than many of those with no higher education. In fact, education does not teach people how to become rich. Its the knowledge, experience, skills and literacy within a person, that determines the lifestyle one tend to achieve.

2. Switzerland and Hungary in Europe and Mongolia are also the land locked countries that have significantly higher lifestyle. Belgium and Luxembourg are also between comparatively dense populated and powerful countries Germany and France. If they can be developed, why not Nepal. It can just be an excuse not a real reason.

3. The geographical feature of Nepal in unique and comprises of around 3500 micro climate. This provides Nepal to grow most variety of crops than any other country in the world and I view it as a positive aspect. Nepal bears 8 tallest peak of the world out of ten along with the peak of the world “Mt. Everest“. The beauty of mountains is famous all around the world. The main problem is not the mountains and the geographical complication, the problem is we do not know what we have got and how to manage it for the benefit. How can we say the geographical feature to be barrier for Nepal to develop when we have not used it to produce goods and services and acted it just as a burden.

4. English language skills is not at all a constraint for development. We can look at the example of Thailand, Belgium, Korea and many more who developed even after hating English.

5. Corruption is a common problem for all developing and developed countries. Even India is not untouched by it for a nearer example. It bears a share but not the real reason why Nepal is poor.

6. Nepal and India share almost the same sort of Politicians, who forget the election agendas after the election and the voters after they have voted. So, why is India having one of the world’s fastest developing country and Nepal remaining almost same.

7. Philippines is the most exporting country in terms of  Manpower. In fact, this export was one of the main reason what Philippines have achieved. The exported manpower are in fact generating more revenue and contributing more for the development of the country then similar ones residing inside. There are exceptions for everything and exceptions cannot be the reason why Nepal is poor.

Mental and physical poverty are related to each other.We are poor because of our Culture of Blames, when something goes wrong. We never take responsibility even of ourselves and look at others to do for us. We are always eager to take the credit of that good thing which we were never part of. Not only the leaders of Nepal are suffered from this illness but all sections of populations. We are more eager to preserve what we possess then to generate we do not have.

Unless and until we Nepali do not change our attitude towards entrepreneurship, and relay on limited enterprises to support our general livelihood, we never develop, we never grow rich. History is evident that, only the industrial revolution can enhance the living standard of people and industrial revolution is only possible when we have Free Market,  a market in which there is no economic intervention and regulation by the state, except to enforce private contracts and the ownership of property. Trade policy in Nepal is really one of the constricting factor blocking Nepal for the economic development.

The answer for “Why is Nepal poor?” is really complicated, but it is the fact that no nation can develop without appropriate trade policy and entrepreneurs.